Thursday, June 27, 2013

Democrats cave on Medicaid


Speaker of the House Philip Gunn just issue the following statements:

Speaker Philip Gunn Statement on Passage of Medicaid Reauthorization Bill
Jackson, MS—House Bill 1 (HB1), the Medicaid Reauthorization Bill, passed the House floor by a vote of 93-23.
"We have passed a bill that only reauthorizes Medicaid," said Speaker of the House Philip Gunn. "There is no repealer in this bill, because we believe that the days of playing politics with the lives of 700,000 Mississippians should end. There are technical parts of the program that will be taken up later that will likely have repealers placed on them, but this bill should not have one.

"Playing politics with people's lives is what got us here today," he continued. "We do not need to find ourselves in gridlock again next year over the existence of a program that not one believes will go away."



Jackson, MS—House Bill 2 (HB2), the Medicaid Appropriations Bill, passed the House floor by a vote of 115-1. It provides $840 million in state supported funds.
“I commend House members for their prudent work today on funding and reauthorizing the Division of Medicaid,” said Speaker of the House Philip Gunn. “We hope our counterparts in the Senate pass these clean bills so we can continue medical coverage for those currently on the Medicaid program.”

23 comments:

Anonymous said...

Good timing. The black caucus is so tied up with Paula Deen and Gay Marriage, they don't have time to get bogged down with a discussion of what's literally going on in Mississippi. Therefore the measure passed. If we see Horne and crew on the capitol steps on tonite's news, they'll be opposing voter ID or celebrating gay marriage or passing a half-staff flag measure in anticipation of Mandella's demise. No time for Medicaid.

Marc Rich said...

Good for Speaker Gunn. He's right about that. Now what is doing to do for the working poor? Many hard working citizens have a few teeth missing and need to see a doctor. They aren't going to quit working just so they can get Medicaid. Our state needs a medical program for this segment or Medicaid expansion. Which does the Speaker prefer? Neither.

Anonymous said...

People with missing teeth need a dentist, not a doctor. What we need is a better economy so people can pay for their own medical care. That starts with good education and low crime.

Subsidizing poverty just gets you more poverty.

Elliot said...

Democrats didn't "cave" on this. Everyone knows that they were only trying to force a vote on expansion (which they said all along).

Oh well, guess it makes for a good headline.

You guys will be eating crow when hospitals start hurting and jobs are lost.

Anonymous said...

Help me understand why my tax dollars are needed to replace the missing teeth of the working poor. That makes absolutely no sense. A few years ago, we realized medicaid pays for Viagra. No private insurance program policy pays for Viagra. Maybe the Dems think a man on Viagra with no teeth is better at sex and therefore contributes to the vitality of the community.

Is there another explanation?

Anonymous said...

I consider myself a conservative, but I do not blindly follow the soup of the day views of many of you. I am a cancer survivor, I was very lucky that mine was removed by surgery after early detection. I have a good job and pretty good medical insurance, but was advised shortly after diagnosis to start preparing for bankruptcy if I survived. Most of you are one major disease or injury away from bankruptcy. Working class, minimum wage earners cannot afford to pay more than sniffles and bruises medical problems. I don't know the solution, don't know if medicaid expansion is the answer, but you head is up some politican's arse if you blindly profess that the poor should get a better job and pay without assistance. How many of you have, or had, a grandparent or parent in a nursing home with medicaid paying the tab? How many of you helped with medicaid fraud by moving their assets before putting them in there? I hate a friggin hypocrite.

Anonymous said...

Well said, 5:30pm

And, there are more than a few very wealthy folks who sign up immediately for part B at 65 because they know in the event of a catastrophic illness, what they have paid into the medicare pot won't come close to what their co-pays would be on any private plan.

And, they sure as heck aren't paying all the costs for their elderly parents either!


Here's a news flash, once upon a time, any monies you got from the government had to be paid back out of your estate. All the rich who want that to happen again, please raise your hand

EAB said...

What we need is a better economy so people can pay for their own medical care.

I think you seriously fail to understand just how expensive medical care is, and how impossible it is for many working people to afford health insurance.

A better economy isn't going to help the people who are already working full-time in low-wage jobs. Regardless of the state of the overall economy, they're not going to pay very much more than they do now. The people who work in them can't afford an individual policy of $250 on a monthly gross of $1167, which is what you make if you work 40 hours/week at $7/hour.

Any given person can get a better job, but someone will always have those jobs, because we need nursing home aides and waitresses and cashiers and janitors. Should we just say "too bad for them" and accept that a good chunk of the population is doomed to be vulnerable to medical catastrophe?

Anonymous said...

The fat Tater better do as good as the Speaker

Anonymous said...

6:17; You win the dunce contest. I turned 65 and took out a supplemental policy myself. Newsflash! I pay monthly for the damned thing. I don't expect the government or you to cover the cost of my illnesses. I paid into the medicare system since the day it began and pay the monthly premium for supplemental insurance. What else do you suggest I do? Well, other than paying for others' coverage.

Additionally said...

And his 'estate claim' is bullshit.

Anonymous said...

How about if we start working driving down the cost of medical care instead of trying to figure out how to transfer that ever increasing cost to somebody else??? Maybe...just MAYBE...if it didn't cost $250 to see a doctor for a cold, health care insurance wouldn't be so important. And let's no forget for even one second that NOBODY gets turned away for NECESSARY medical care, regardless of ability to pay. And, finally, I submit that maybe, just MAYBE, a person who is earning only $7.50 an hour really should think twice before giving birth even ONCE, much less 4, 5, & 6 times...as was the case in an articleI read earlier today on this subject. Woman in Texas didn't qualify for medicaid because she was working..at $7.50 an hour, husband "disabled"...and 6 kids at home. Far too common a story.

Anonymous said...

8:48 nobody is turned away from an emergency room. you don't get anything more than critical care. people die every day because they can't afford health care and medicine. get your head out of Phil's arse.

EAB said...

Many people get turned down for necessary non-emergency medical care. The ER has to treat you for emergencies, but they can release you as soon as you're clinically stable (i.e. not threatening to die). If you break a bone, they will take X-rays, put on a temporary splint, give you pain meds, and send you home with a referral to the orthopedist. The ortho doesn't have to and will not treat you if you can't pay.

I had outpatient ankle surgery this morning, and they wanted their $794 deductible up front. My ankle wasn't going to kill me, and the ER docs don't perform complex orthopedic surgeries anyway. Without insurance, I wouldn't have been able to get my ankle fixed and hopefully be able to walk again.

EAB said...

Oh, one more thing for 8:48: "thinking twice before giving birth" doesn't help you if you had an unplanned pregnancy, as half of all pregnancies are. It is even more useless if you already gave birth at a time when your finances were in better order.

bill said...

8:19, people die every day because they decided to smoke two packs a day for thirty years. Where do you draw the line on the people die every day reasoning? How much death are the taxpayers responsible for preventing?

Elliot said...

"Where do you draw the line on the people die every day reasoning? How much death are the taxpayers responsible for preventing?"

Bill, you've fallen victim to the continuum fallacy (I think. It's been a long time since philosophy 101). Just because it's hard to draw the line doesn't mean we *shouldn't* draw it.

Just because some of our state's citizens, for example, over-eat and are obese, doesn't mean we should just say f*** everyone who needs healthcare just because X% of these people have brought it on themselves.

bill said...

Elliot, Anonymous at 8:48 suggested that people die every day from lack of health insurance, and I presume his subsequent comment meant that he believes the state should expand Medicaid. There are really two "how far do we go" questions. How far do we expand Medicaid? The proposal will put a third of our population on it. Where do we stop? Half? Three quarters? I imagine everyone would like to receive free health care. At some point the number of taxpayers who aren't on Medicaid will be insufficient to support the ones who are. The second is the one you commented on. How much responsibility should society - the taxpayers - assume in preventing the untimely death of its citizens? If providing health insurance to the working poor is going to prevent some of them from an untimely death, then why not try to prevent more? By now you are certain to have seen my point, but I'll make it anyway. Health care costs money, and that money has to be provided by someone. Absent reductions in other areas of government or health care costs, tax revenue will have to increase in order to pay for the additional health care that will be given away. I know it's up to each of us to do what we can to prevent our untimely death, but it is also government's role to protect and care for its citizens, right? So, once again, where to we draw the line? I would genuinely like to see how people feel about this.

EAB said...

Bill, I think the strongest argument for the expansion of Medicaid to 138% of poverty is that we already have expansion of Medicaid to 138% for a specific group: pregnant women.

People who can afford health insurance should pay for it. That's why the premium subsidies kick in after you pass 138% of the poverty line, and phase out at higher income levels. However, that 138% is where we already recognize that health insurance takes up too large a share of income to be fiscally possible.

I'm sure you probably know women who have delivered on Medicaid. If we believe in covering pregnancy costs (which run about 10K for an uncomplicated vaginal delivery, and often higher if you need a C-section or NICU), what makes that different from breast cancer? That's been a pretty good place to draw the line for a lot of years, so it seems reasonable to me to keep the line there for other health conditions.

bill said...

Good argument, and you're right - I know people who receive Medicaid benefits. I think the higher threshold for pregnant women is to produce more healthy babies, and pregnancy is the only medical condition that produces babies. That said, the line I'm asking about is the percentage of the population that the rest of us can afford to support. 138% of the poverty line - by the way, who decided what the poverty line was going to be in the first place? - still puts a third of our population on the program - over a million people. Although I don't know when or how the poverty line is adjusted, what happens when that inevitably occurs? I realize that people without enough money need help, but the number of people who can help is going down. My concern remains that eventually we'll run short of taxpayers and either services will have to be cut or people will have to be removed from the rolls. That's when the real fun will begin...

EAB said...

Bill, the reason Medicaid coverage produces healthy babies is because childbirth is such an expensive medical procedure that poor families cannot cover the costs. From that perspective, it's no different from treatment for any other serious illness or injury.

There's ultimately no way to get around the costs of medical care. Poor people either go un-treated and wind up dead or on disability, or they get medical care that they can't pay for. In the latter case, those costs are financed by higher taxes for DSH payments and higher hospital costs being charged to the insured population. Plus, by the time those uninsured people are sick enough to seek out services through the ER, it usually winds up being far more expensive. If you have asthma and can't pay for the $200 doctor visit or the $50/month inhaled steroids, you'll be looking at a $5000 ER visit when you have a serious asthma attack.

Either way, the taxpayers and insured people are already footing the bills of the uninsured. That's why the ACA was scored as cost-neutral by the Congressional Budget Office. I recognize that not everyone accepts those numbers, but they're the best estimates we have.

Anonymous said...

Why did Tate cave? He was barreling toward a one year repealer on the authorization bill. Then suddenly he wasn't.
You know he wants the expansion money.

bill said...

EAB, I know how the system works. I worked in it in one capacity or another all my adult life. Health care costs can be reduced. So much money is dedicated to administration and CYA BS that it's no surprise that a hospital aspirin costs twenty bucks. My question still remains: Where do we draw the line? What percentage of the population has to be taken care of by the taxpayers before it becomes too expensive? We need to be working on keeping that percentage as low as we can, while at the same time reworking our health care delivery model to save money.

The ACA being scored cost neutral was ridiculous, but even if it's accurate it happened because it contains deep cuts to Medicare, which was missed by the elderly who weren't paying attention.



Recent Comments

Search Jackson Jambalaya

Subscribe to JJ's Youtube channel

Archives

Trollfest '09

Trollfest '07 was such a success that Jackson Jambalaya will once again host Trollfest '09. Catch this great event which will leave NE Jackson & Fondren in flames. Othor Cain and his band, The Black Power Structure headline the night while Sonjay Poontang returns for an encore performance. Former Frank Melton bodyguard Marcus Wright makes his premier appearance at Trollfest singing "I'm a Sweet Transvestite" from "The Rocky Horror Picture Show." Kamikaze will sing his new hit, “How I sold out to da Man.” Robbie Bell again performs: “Mamas, don't let your babies grow up to be Bells” and “Any friend of Ed Peters is a friend of mine”. After the show, Ms. Bell will autograph copies of her mug shot photos. In a salute to “Dancing with the Stars”, Ms. Bell and Hinds County District Attorney Robert Smith will dance the Wango Tango.

Wrestling returns, except this time it will be a Battle Royal with Othor Cain, Ben Allen, Kim Wade, Haley Fisackerly, Alan Lange, and “Big Cat” Donna Ladd all in the ring at the same time. The Battle Royal will be in a steel cage, no time limit, no referee, and the losers must leave town. Marshand Crisler will be the honorary referee (as it gives him a title without actually having to do anything).


Meet KIM Waaaaaade at the Entergy Tent. For five pesos, Kim will sell you a chance to win a deed to a crack house on Ridgeway Street stuffed in the Howard Industries pinata. Don't worry if the pinata is beaten to shreds, as Mr. Wade has Jose, Emmanuel, and Carlos, all illegal immigrants, available as replacements for the it. Upon leaving the Entergy tent, fig leaves will be available in case Entergy literally takes everything you have as part of its Trollfest ticket price adjustment charge.

Donna Ladd of The Jackson Free Press will give several classes on learning how to write. Smearing, writing without factchecking, and reporting only one side of a story will be covered. A donation to pay their taxes will be accepted and she will be signing copies of their former federal tax liens. Ms. Ladd will give a dramatic reading of her two award-winning essays (They received The Jackson Free Press "Best Of" awards.) "Why everything is always about me" and "Why I cover murders better than anyone else in Jackson".

In the spirit of helping those who are less fortunate, Trollfest '09 adopts a cause for which a portion of the proceeds and donations will be donated: Keeping Frank Melton in his home. The “Keep Frank Melton From Being Homeless” booth will sell chances for five dollars to pin the tail on the jackass. John Reeves has graciously volunteered to be the jackass for this honorable excursion into saving Frank's ass. What's an ass between two friends after all? If Mr. Reeves is unable to um, perform, Speaker Billy McCoy has also volunteered as when the word “jackass” was mentioned he immediately ran as fast as he could to sign up.


In order to help clean up the legal profession, Adam Kilgore of the Mississippi Bar will be giving away free, round-trip plane tickets to the North Pole where they keep their bar complaint forms (which are NOT available online). If you don't want to go to the North Pole, you can enjoy Brant Brantley's (of the Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance) free guided tours of the quicksand field over by High Street where all complaints against judges disappear. If for some reason you are unable to control yourself, never fear; Judge Houston Patton will operate his jail where no lawyers are needed or allowed as you just sit there for minutes... hours.... months...years until he decides he is tired of you sitting in his jail. Do not think Judge Patton is a bad judge however as he plans to serve free Mad Dog 20/20 to all inmates.

Trollfest '09 is a pet-friendly event as well. Feel free to bring your dog with you and do not worry if your pet gets hungry, as employees of the Jackson Zoo will be on hand to provide some of their animals as food when it gets to be feeding time for your little loved one.

Relax at the Fox News Tent. Since there are only three blonde reporters in Jackson (being blonde is a requirement for working at Fox News), Megan and Kathryn from WAPT and Wendy from WLBT will be on loan to Fox. To gain admittance to the VIP section, bring either your Republican Party ID card or a Rebel Flag. Bringing both and a torn-up Obama yard sign will entitle you to free drinks served by Megan, Wendy, and Kathryn. Get your tickets now. Since this is an event for trolls, no ID is required. Just bring the hate. Bring the family, Trollfest '09 is for EVERYONE!!!

This is definitely a Beaver production.


Note: Security provided by INS.

Trollfest '07

Jackson Jambalaya is the home of Trollfest '07. Catch this great event which promises to leave NE Jackson & Fondren in flames. Sonjay Poontang and his band headline the night with a special steel cage, no time limit "loser must leave town" bout between Alan Lange and "Big Cat"Donna Ladd following afterwards. Kamikaze will perform his new song F*** Bush, he's still a _____. Did I mention there was no referee? Dr. Heddy Matthias and Lori Gregory will face off in the undercard dueling with dangling participles and other um, devices. Robbie Bell will perform Her two latest songs: My Best Friends are in the Media and Mama's, Don't Let Your Babies Grow up to be George Bell. Sid Salter of The Clarion-Ledger will host "Pin the Tail on the Trial Lawyer", sponsored by State Farm.

There will be a hugging booth where in exchange for your young son, Frank Melton will give you a loooong hug. Trollfest will have a dunking booth where Muhammed the terrorist will curse you to Allah as you try to hit a target that will drop him into a vat of pig grease. However, in the true spirit of Separate But Equal, Don Imus and someone from NE Jackson will also sit in the dunking booth for an equal amount of time. Tom Head will give a reading for two hours on why he can't figure out who the hell he is. Cliff Cargill will give lessons with his .80 caliber desert eagle, using Frank Melton photos as targets. Tackleberry will be on hand for an autograph session. KIM Waaaaaade will be passing out free titles and deeds to crackhouses formerly owned by The Wood Street Players.

If you get tired come relax at the Fox News Tent. To gain admittance to the VIP section, bring either your Republican Party ID card or a Rebel Flag. Bringing both will entitle you to free drinks.Get your tickets now. Since this is an event for trolls, no ID is required, just bring the hate. Bring the family, Trollfest '07 is for EVERYONE!!!

This is definitely a Beaver production.

Note: Security provided by INS
.